October 9, 2023

Texas’s new commercial courts: What litigators need to know

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter


W. Tyler Perry

|

October 9, 2023

Texas is booming as people flock to the business-friendly state, looking for everything from quality of life to a more supportive business environment.  Yet one of the strongest critiques from the Texas business community has remained: Slow dispute resolution for civil cases between sophisticated businesses.  This persistent issue has many causes, but it can generally be traced to a congested court system in which overburdened judges are tasked with deciding complicated business disputes without the requisite specialization and resources. 

This past summer, Texas elected to remedy the issue.  Governor Abbot signed into law H.B. 19, which created a specialty trial court for business disputes (the “TBC”), effective September 1, 2023.  The courts themselves will be up and running this time next year.  As Texas litigators working in litigation finance and insurance, Certum Group anticipates that these courts will become a substantial part of the Texas legal and business ecosystem and is accordingly following these developments with great interest.  

For the curious but uninitiated, here are some key facts and considerations regarding this new forum for dispute resolution in Texas.  

Recognizing the complexity inherent in large commercial litigations and the attendant benefits of expertise, the TBC will have specialized jurisdiction over two primary types of cases: corporate governance disputes and commercial disputes.

Where the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million , the court will generally have jurisdiction over (i) derivative proceedings, (ii) actions regarding corporate governance, (iii) certain claims arising under state or federal securities and trade regulations, (iv) certain actions against the owner of an organization, (v) an action arising out of the Business Organizations Code, and (vi) suits alleging breach of corporate fiduciary obligations. 

Where the amount in controversy exceeds $10 million , the court will have jurisdiction over actions in which (i) the parties specified TBC jurisdiction in the operative contract, (ii) violations of the Finance Code or Business and Commerce Code, or (iii) where the action arises out of a “qualified transaction”—which is generally defined as transactions involving loans, advances, or credit. 

As a practical matter, by providing a centralized forum for the resolution of these common-yet-complex commercial and corporate governance cases, Texas hopes to both standardize and speed up the resolution of these important matters.

The judges on the TBC will consist of individuals with specialized knowledge and experience in litigating complex commercial and corporate governance disputes.  And the judges will be appointed for two-year terms by the Governor with the “advice and consent” of the Texas Senate.  Unlike most state court judges in Texas, judges on the TBC must be at least 35 years of age (rather than 25) and have at least 10 years of experience (rather than 4).  

The legislature’s goal in requiring a more seasoned milieu of jurists is an increase in experience and (hopefully) pragmatism.

Simultaneous to enacting H.B. 19, the Texas legislature enacted S.B. 1045, which created the Fifteenth Court of Appeals.  Seated in Austin, the court will have jurisdiction over appeals from the TBC and initially consist of a chief justice and two associate justices.  In practice, this means that (at least for the first three years) all appeals will be heard by the same three-judge panel.  The clear advantage of this new court is that it will ensure the existence of known and consistent case law at both the trial and appellate level.  The Texas Supreme Court has jurisdiction over appeals from the Fifteenth Court of Appeals.

By requiring judges of the TBC to issue reasoned opinions, Texas hopes to create a predictable, stable, and fully articulated body of case law for Texas businesses.  And, as of yet, there is every reason to think that it will succeed. 

While the courts do not come online until next fall, litigators should start to prepare today.  Here are a few practice tips:

  • When drafting contracts, consider whether your client should elect jurisdiction in the TBC once they are open. 
  • When deciding whether to commence litigation over the next 12 months, consider whether to file now in the existing courts, or whether to wait until next September to file in the business courts. 
  • Familiarize yourself with the rules and procedures of the TBC, so you are ready to take advantage of these potentially attractive new courts for your clients.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Recent Content

Blurred view through glass of a meeting in a sunlit office.
By Certum Team January 12, 2026
Litigation finance has become an essential tool for modern litigation strategy — but with its growth has come a wave of discovery requests seeking information about funding arrangements. These requests are improper, burdensome, and legally unsupported. To help lawyers and litigants push back with confidence, Certum has released a new Model Brief Opposing Discovery of Litigation Funding—a comprehensive, practitioner-oriented document designed to equip litigators with the strongest arguments, cases, and frameworks available. This publication is now available for free download . The Model Brief is part of Certum’s growing library of thought leadership and practical guidance on litigation finance and insurance. That library includes Certum’s Guide to Litigation Funding and its annual survey of in-house counsel . Across federal and state courts, parties continue to seek discovery into litigation funding sources and materials, often as a tactic rather than a legitimate inquiry into claims or defenses. These efforts raise serious issues: Privilege and work-product concerns Chilling effects on access to justice Attempts to shift focus away from the merits Increased litigation costs and delays Yet for many lawyers, responding to these requests requires reinventing the wheel. Certum’s model brief solves that problem. It provides a structured, persuasive, and research-backed response that can be adapted swiftly to any case. Click here to download the brief.
By Certum Team January 6, 2026
Bloomberg recently interviewed Certum Group’s William Marra as part of its coverage of efforts by commercial liability insurers to require the disclosure of third-party litigation funding agreements. Marra explained to Bloomberg that “[t]he disclosure of litigation funding risks putting impecunious litigants at a systematic disadvantage in our legal system,” adding mandatory disclosure “can disclose to defendants very valuable information, including who has funding, and critically, who does not have funding.” Marra further responded to the argument that litigation funders might fuel frivolous litigation. “To the contrary, the evidence shows that funders serve as a very effective screen, only backing the most meritorious cases, and if anything, likely resulting in fewer weak cases getting filed,” Marra said. This statements builds on arguments Marra previously advantaged in a Vanderbilt Law Review article about litigation funding.  The Bloomberg article is available here .
Blurred view of a business meeting in progress through a glass door. People are seated around a table.
By Certum Team December 17, 2025
Certum’s William Marra has been elected to the Board of Directors of the International Legal Finance Association, the litigation finance industry’s leading advocacy group. Will joins five other new members of ILFA’s Board, including: Marcel Wegmüller, the co-founder and CEO of Nivalion; David Perla, the Vice Chair of Burford Capital; Erik Bomans, the CEO of Deminor Recovery Services; Kacey Wolmer, the CEO of Contingency Capital; Rob Rothkopf, the founder and Managing Partner of Balance Legal Capital. “We are honored to welcome Marcel, David, Erik, Kacey, Rob, and William to ILFA’s Board of Directors,” said Paul Kong, the Executive Director of ILFA. “Each brings exceptional expertise, deep industry insight, and a demonstrated commitment to the responsible growth of legal finance. Their leadership will strengthen ILFA’s work to promote transparency, expand access to justice, and support the continued global development of our industry.” “I am delighted to join ILFA’s Board and assist with its important public policy work,” Will Marra said. “Litigation finance helps level the playing field and ensures cases are resolved based on their merits, not the size of a party’s checkbook. LFA’s advocacy for claimholders who need litigation finance is more important now than ever before.” The International Legal Finance Association (ILFA) represents the global commercial legal finance community, and its mission is to engage, educate and influence legislative, regulatory and judicial landscapes as the voice of the commercial legal finance industry. It is the only global association of commercial legal finance companies and is an independent, non-profit trade association promoting the highest standards of operation and service for the commercial legal finance sector. ILFA has local chapter representation around the world.