How Data Can Drive Better Litigation Decisions: Where to File and What to Expect

By Adam J. Feldman October 17, 2023

Lawyer pointing to a document as a client signs it at a desk.

Guest Post by Adam J. Feldman, editor of Empirical SCOTUS

Sometimes litigants do not have freedom on where to file cases. Venue is often dictated by where an action occurs leading to a complaint.  In situations where litigants have some flexibility on where to file though, there is room for strategic litigation decisions.  Even when they do not, statistics help them account for the possibility that their decisions will withstand an appeal. Below are statistics related to federal appeals court decisions on district court cases filed in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2023. 1

One simple metric of interest, total appeals terminated, reflects the relative caseloads of the 12 geographic circuits along with the subject matter-specific Federal Circuit. 2

The number of cases by circuit roughly parallels the circuit size so that those circuits encompassing larger populations have relatively more cases filed than those circuits covering smaller territories. While the graph above gives a general sense of the landscape of federal appeals, a more helpful metric for litigation planning is how inundated judges in the circuits are by their caseloads. The next graph shows the count of terminated cases by active judges for the same period of time.

Here we see that even though the Ninth Circuit is the largest geographic circuit, it only has the fifth highest rate of terminated cases by a judge.  The number of cases terminated by a judge in the Ninth Circuit is on average 253 fewer than those terminated by a judge in the Eighth Circuit.

Aside from the Federal Circuit which hears appeals by case type rather than by location of the appeal, the circuits primarily hear cases surrounding similar issues. It is therefore helpful to know the circuit’s breakdown by substantive case types focusing on the percentage of each case type within each circuit. 

The Ninth and D.C. Circuits for instance heard the largest percentages of administrative appeals. Ninth Circuit administrative appeals typically relate to immigration cases while executive agency cases are primarily conducted within the D.C. Circuit.  The First and Fifth Circuits heard the highest percentage of private civil cases, and the D.C. Circuit heard a much greater proportion of U.S. civil appeals than any of the other circuits.

Two other points that may be particularly helpful for litigants are reversal rates in the various circuits and more granular data focusing on particular issues. Although the U.S. Courts’ statistics do not break cases down by specific issue areas, we can remove cases from several of the case types including criminal, that do not involve civil litigants.  Based on these two items, the next graph shows reversal rates for private civil cases (and patent or trademark decisions from the Federal Circuit) over the 12-month period ending June 30, 2023.

The circuits’ reversal rates at the top of the graph at around 15% are markedly different from those at the bottom of the graph which are around 10% and below.

Bankruptcy cases are substantively different from private civil cases, so it makes sense to look at these counts and reversal rates in isolation.  Certain circuits did not review a statistically significant number of bankruptcy decisions so their reversal rates are not shown.

The Third and Eleventh Circuits reversal rates in bankruptcy cases far exceed those for the other circuits. Looking at these numbers as distinct from the private civil cases also prevents either type of decision from throwing off the reversal rates from the other type.

Statistical information like this can help paint a clearer picture of a litigation landscape. Litigants can use it to make strategic decisions to the extent that they have flexibility of where to file. These statistics also provide litigants with more clarity for their expectations of likelihood that a trial court decision will be overturned.  This can also help companies with regular litigation before one of more judicial district(s) plan for whether or not to appeal and for what to expect from an appeal.  With the right set of data and tools, one can further break these numbers down by specific judge, more particular issues, or within other dimensions. 

Adam Feldman is the editor of Empirical SCOTUS , a blog that conducts data analysis of the United States Supreme Court, and the Principal of Optimized Legal, a legal data/statistical consultancy. He is also an adjunct professor of political science and public law at California State University, Northridge. You can reach Adam for specific data and analyses related to your own litigation questions in this and other areas.


1 Data for analyses below was provided by Judicial Business Statistics from USCourts.gov. All data is for geographic circuit courts and does not include the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. The data relate to judicial business conducted between the end of June 2022 and June 2023.

2 DC refers to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals; FC refers to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter

Recent Content

By Certum Team March 5, 2026
Above the Law, a leading blog focused on the legal industry, recently highlighted Certum Group’s litigation finance fellowship, noting the opportunity for law students and business students to gain “a four-week, hands-on immersion in what it actually looks like when capital meets complex litigation.” “To succeed, lawyers need to understand not only doctrine but also finance. Law schools are beginning to reflect that shift, and students want to understand it,” Certum’s William Marra told Above the Law. “Our Summer Fellowship is about opening that door for both law and business students, and giving them meaningful exposure to the capital side of litigation.”  Applications for the fellowship are due on March 31, 2026, and should include a resume, law school transcript, and a brief 250-word statement of interest. Applications should be sent to SummerFellowship@CertumGroup.com . Above the Law’s coverage is available here , and Certum’s application page for the fellowship is available here .
By Certum Group March 2, 2026
For the third consecutive year, Certum Group will host one or more summer fellows, introducing accomplished law students and business students to the growing field of litigation finance. The Certum Group Litigation Finance Fellowship provides top law students with an opportunity to gain hands-on experience in the rapidly growing fields of litigation finance and litigation insurance. Fellows will evaluate litigation funding submissions, draft memoranda analyzing legal and damages issues, help structure and negotiate funding agreements, and contribute to marketing and business development initiatives. They will work closely with Certum’s experienced team of litigation finance, litigation insurance, and investment professionals. Throughout the program, Fellows will develop a practical understanding of how claimholders, law firms, insurers, and capital providers assess litigation risk — and how capital can be deployed as a strategic tool in complex disputes. Further information about the fellowship and instructions about how to apply are available here.
By Certum Group February 24, 2026
Columbia Law School’s blog on corporations and the public markets, The CLS Blue Sky Blog, recently featured the scholarly work on litigation finance written by Indiana University Business School Professor Suneal Bedi and Certum’s William C. Marra. In their blog post, Bedi and Marra discuss their article Litigation Finance in the Market Square , which was recently published in the Southern California Law Review. Their work reframes litigation finance as a capital markets innovation rather than solely a civil justice mechanism. While much of the public debate has centered on questions of disclosure, control, and settlement incentives, Bedi and Marra emphasize that legal claims often represent significant but illiquid contingent assets on a firm’s balance sheet. When policymakers regulate litigation finance, they are regulating not just the legal business but the capital markets. And they are regulating capital markets in a way that is more likely to harm small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) while protecting large companies from competition.  The full blog post is available here.