May 12, 2021

Identifying Litigation Trends to Protect Your Brand

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter


Dean Gresham

|

May 12, 2021

Corporate legal departments were once viewed as little more than an internal law firm. They handled legal problems in relative isolation, largely cut-off from the company’s commercial activities. Today, in-house legal teams are increasingly seen as an important and inseparable component of the company’s business team. 

With this shift has come an expectation that legal departments do more than react to legal problems as they arise. They are expected to proactively monitor litigation trends, looking for clues in the evolving legal landscape to help the organization better position itself or even pre-empt potential problems before they develop.

Trend watchers agree that the wide range of issues related to COVID-19 will continue to command considerable attention in the near future. The challenging environment of the last year has resulted in a variety of contract and commercial disputes as well labor/employment issues. In addition, COVID-19 can be expected to impact the nature and frequency of worker’s compensation claims, insurance coverage disputes, legislative changes, loan defaults and bankruptcy filings.  

Many believe the reopening of the economy will also see the filing of legal disputes predating the pandemic. Numerous potential litigants delayed pursuing lawsuits while focused on other concerns over the last year. For others, recent difficulties have made pursuing certain disputes now critical enough to be worth the trouble and expense of litigation. In short, issues you thought were behind you may be returning.  

Cyber-security and data protection are also areas of increasing concern. A network shutdown, whether caused by a deliberate attack or an innocuous technology issue, can bring businesses to a halt and engender significant litigation risks from numerous angles. Laws regarding digital security are still evolving and that uncertainty only adds to the risk. Additionally, a large data breach is almost always followed by a class action.  

Consumer-friendly statutory protections in some jurisdictions can make the fallout from data breaches particularly problematic.  

Speaking of class actions, securities fraud and false advertising claims continue to be a source of numerous cases. For both of these areas, it is relatively easy for the vigilant to monitor claims being raised within one’s industry. If a competitor is facing such a claim, it is a safe bet your organization should recognize and address the possibility of similar claims.

Counsel for product manufacturers, distributors and retailers know they are always exposed to a variety of claims, from economic losses to personal injuries. In-house counsel should take note of litigation involving competitors. A telling recent example is Volkswagen’s “Dieselgate” woes spreading until similar claims were also alleged against every one of its competitors.

Part of monitoring litigation trends is keeping up with developments in insurance litigation and coverage. COVID-19 and the rise of cyber-attacks are two easy examples to highlight how quickly and dramatically things can change. It is critical to continually reassess insurance coverage against potential litigation risk. Policies purchased for yesterday’s problems may not be appropriate for tomorrow’s lawsuit.  

If your company is facing uncertainty because of litigation and you would like to explore strategies to minimize that uncertainty, please  contact us  to discuss how we may be able to help.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Recent Content

By Certum Team March 5, 2026
Above the Law, a leading blog focused on the legal industry, recently highlighted Certum Group’s litigation finance fellowship, noting the opportunity for law students and business students to gain “a four-week, hands-on immersion in what it actually looks like when capital meets complex litigation.” “To succeed, lawyers need to understand not only doctrine but also finance. Law schools are beginning to reflect that shift, and students want to understand it,” Certum’s William Marra told Above the Law. “Our Summer Fellowship is about opening that door for both law and business students, and giving them meaningful exposure to the capital side of litigation.”  Applications for the fellowship are due on March 31, 2026, and should include a resume, law school transcript, and a brief 250-word statement of interest. Applications should be sent to SummerFellowship@CertumGroup.com . Above the Law’s coverage is available here , and Certum’s application page for the fellowship is available here .
By Certum Group March 2, 2026
For the third consecutive year, Certum Group will host one or more summer fellows, introducing accomplished law students and business students to the growing field of litigation finance. The Certum Group Litigation Finance Fellowship provides top law students with an opportunity to gain hands-on experience in the rapidly growing fields of litigation finance and litigation insurance. Fellows will evaluate litigation funding submissions, draft memoranda analyzing legal and damages issues, help structure and negotiate funding agreements, and contribute to marketing and business development initiatives. They will work closely with Certum’s experienced team of litigation finance, litigation insurance, and investment professionals. Throughout the program, Fellows will develop a practical understanding of how claimholders, law firms, insurers, and capital providers assess litigation risk — and how capital can be deployed as a strategic tool in complex disputes. Further information about the fellowship and instructions about how to apply are available here.
By Certum Group February 24, 2026
Columbia Law School’s blog on corporations and the public markets, The CLS Blue Sky Blog, recently featured the scholarly work on litigation finance written by Indiana University Business School Professor Suneal Bedi and Certum’s William C. Marra. In their blog post, Bedi and Marra discuss their article Litigation Finance in the Market Square , which was recently published in the Southern California Law Review. Their work reframes litigation finance as a capital markets innovation rather than solely a civil justice mechanism. While much of the public debate has centered on questions of disclosure, control, and settlement incentives, Bedi and Marra emphasize that legal claims often represent significant but illiquid contingent assets on a firm’s balance sheet. When policymakers regulate litigation finance, they are regulating not just the legal business but the capital markets. And they are regulating capital markets in a way that is more likely to harm small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) while protecting large companies from competition.  The full blog post is available here.