May 19, 2021

When is it Time to Hold and Time to Fold?

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter


Dean Gresham

|

May 19, 2021

The settle-or-litigate conundrum

A victory, in complex litigation, is sometimes difficult to distinguish from a Pyrrhic victory.  King Pyrrhus won the battle, but his army suffered such heavy and irreplaceable losses that he was forced to abandon his campaign against the Romans. High stakes litigation can easily drag on and the accumulated attorney’s fees and discovery expenses can end up approaching or even exceeding an amount that might have resolved the dispute months or even years earlier. 

There is no science of knowing when to litigate and when to settle. Every dispute presents its own difficulties and opportunities. Although we know almost all litigation settles before trial, there will always still be some cases with no workable path to compromise. Moreover, even when settlement is clearly in the cards, there is never a perfect time to settle.

The Courthouse Steps

A critical last-minute ruling from the court will sometimes push the parties toward a compromise they had avoided for years. However, such eve-of-trial settlements seldom survive the scrutiny of hindsight. After all, it takes a lot of time and money to reach those courthouse steps. Too often, parties realize that they failed to explore earlier opportunities to resolve the case. A useful way to approach the settle-or-litigate conundrum is to remain wary of any case snowballing all too predicably toward another and costly eve-of-trial settlement that might be resolved earlier and far more efficiently.

The Bigger Picture

Litigation does not take place in a vacuum. Decisions about courtroom tactics and settlement approaches need to be consistent with the near, and long term, goals of the company. Time spent dealing with a lawsuit can reduce the productivity of key employees. Litigation can impact business relationships, funding and investors, stock prices, insurability and more. Sometimes the need to settle is driven by a need to get back to business.

The Cost of Discovery

There are two sorts of costs to discovery during litigation. First, there is the money.  Discovery is the most expensive aspect of litigation and, in many complex matters, can readily provide its own justification for pursuing settlement. Second, there is the disclosure aspect. Discovery often means sharing information a company would prefer not to share. There is no reason to actually incur all costs of discovery before including them in settle-or-litigate calculations.

Merits and Money

Don’t overemphasize the strength or weakness of an opponent’s legal position. Your perception of the merits of a case must always be weighed with not only the amount at stake but the cost of further litigation. It is often far better to pay a smaller amount to settle a case instead of spending a great deal of time and money just to “win.”

Creative Solutions and Litigation Insurance

An exorbitant demand for X and a stingy counteroffer for Y. There are more creative ways to get deals done. When deciding to settle or litigate, consider the availability and cost of litigation buyout insurance that can replace the uncertainty of litigation, long before any settlement is reached, with a known, fixed cost. In the class action context, remember that a claims-made settlement can be designed in any number of different ways. Work with class action experts and develop a settlement structure that makes the most sense for your organization. Keep in mind that insurance is available even after a settlement is reached to absorb the risk of a claims-made settlement. 

If your company is facing uncertainty because of litigation and you would like to explore strategies to minimize that uncertainty, please  contact us  to discuss how we may be able to help.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Recent Content

Blurred view through glass of a meeting in a sunlit office.
By Certum Team January 12, 2026
Litigation finance has become an essential tool for modern litigation strategy — but with its growth has come a wave of discovery requests seeking information about funding arrangements. These requests are improper, burdensome, and legally unsupported. To help lawyers and litigants push back with confidence, Certum has released a new Model Brief Opposing Discovery of Litigation Funding—a comprehensive, practitioner-oriented document designed to equip litigators with the strongest arguments, cases, and frameworks available. This publication is now available for free download . The Model Brief is part of Certum’s growing library of thought leadership and practical guidance on litigation finance and insurance. That library includes Certum’s Guide to Litigation Funding and its annual survey of in-house counsel . Across federal and state courts, parties continue to seek discovery into litigation funding sources and materials, often as a tactic rather than a legitimate inquiry into claims or defenses. These efforts raise serious issues: Privilege and work-product concerns Chilling effects on access to justice Attempts to shift focus away from the merits Increased litigation costs and delays Yet for many lawyers, responding to these requests requires reinventing the wheel. Certum’s model brief solves that problem. It provides a structured, persuasive, and research-backed response that can be adapted swiftly to any case. Click here to download the brief.
By Certum Team January 6, 2026
Bloomberg recently interviewed Certum Group’s William Marra as part of its coverage of efforts by commercial liability insurers to require the disclosure of third-party litigation funding agreements. Marra explained to Bloomberg that “[t]he disclosure of litigation funding risks putting impecunious litigants at a systematic disadvantage in our legal system,” adding mandatory disclosure “can disclose to defendants very valuable information, including who has funding, and critically, who does not have funding.” Marra further responded to the argument that litigation funders might fuel frivolous litigation. “To the contrary, the evidence shows that funders serve as a very effective screen, only backing the most meritorious cases, and if anything, likely resulting in fewer weak cases getting filed,” Marra said. This statements builds on arguments Marra previously advantaged in a Vanderbilt Law Review article about litigation funding.  The Bloomberg article is available here .
Blurred view of a business meeting in progress through a glass door. People are seated around a table.
By Certum Team December 17, 2025
Certum’s William Marra has been elected to the Board of Directors of the International Legal Finance Association, the litigation finance industry’s leading advocacy group. Will joins five other new members of ILFA’s Board, including: Marcel Wegmüller, the co-founder and CEO of Nivalion; David Perla, the Vice Chair of Burford Capital; Erik Bomans, the CEO of Deminor Recovery Services; Kacey Wolmer, the CEO of Contingency Capital; Rob Rothkopf, the founder and Managing Partner of Balance Legal Capital. “We are honored to welcome Marcel, David, Erik, Kacey, Rob, and William to ILFA’s Board of Directors,” said Paul Kong, the Executive Director of ILFA. “Each brings exceptional expertise, deep industry insight, and a demonstrated commitment to the responsible growth of legal finance. Their leadership will strengthen ILFA’s work to promote transparency, expand access to justice, and support the continued global development of our industry.” “I am delighted to join ILFA’s Board and assist with its important public policy work,” Will Marra said. “Litigation finance helps level the playing field and ensures cases are resolved based on their merits, not the size of a party’s checkbook. LFA’s advocacy for claimholders who need litigation finance is more important now than ever before.” The International Legal Finance Association (ILFA) represents the global commercial legal finance community, and its mission is to engage, educate and influence legislative, regulatory and judicial landscapes as the voice of the commercial legal finance industry. It is the only global association of commercial legal finance companies and is an independent, non-profit trade association promoting the highest standards of operation and service for the commercial legal finance sector. ILFA has local chapter representation around the world.