June 29, 2022

Judgment Preservation Insurance: Protecting Plaintiffs’ Awards

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter


Ross Weiner

|

June 29, 2022

This article originally appeared in Bloomberg Law .

With any significant trial court judgment, there is always a risk that an appellate court will reverse (in whole or in part) or reduce a damages award. Judgment preservation insurance (JPI) allows plaintiffs who prevailed at the trial court to insure all or part of a damage award while an appeal is pending.

It is axiomatic that the wheels of justice move slowly. An appeal from a favorable legal judgment can take many years to resolve. Indeed, in some circumstances, the delay is the point. Transforming a legal skirmish into a war of attrition can cause a plaintiff to cry uncle, opting to settle the matter while leaving money on the table. But JPI can change that.

Put simply, JPI is a targeted way to ring-fence appellate risk while allowing companies with a favorable judgment to immediately leverage the financial benefits of the award. JPI can be used in the context of summary judgment awards, trial verdicts, and arbitration wins. With JPI, plaintiffs who prevail at the trial court level can obtain immediate protection of judgments that are threatened with reversal or reduction in damages on appeal. For corporate plaintiffs, JPI may provide additional final statement benefits.

JPI is a form of insurance that guarantees a prevailing plaintiff will receive all or part of the trial court’s judgment regardless of what happens to the judgment on appeal, or, in some cases, after a retrial. Generally, JPI is concerned only with final judgments. There can be no loss unless and until the judgment is final and there is no longer any chance of further appeal.

Essentially, JPI is appellate risk insurance—a certain way to “neutralize” the risks associated with appeal. JPI can be obtained by either a party to the litigation or a litigation funder looking to lock in a certain level of return. Depending on the amount of the policy, JPI indemnifies the policy holder for some or all of a judgment. Indeed, it may insure all of the judgment, or it may be targeted at a specific legal issue that is challenged on appeal, such as attorneys’ fees or statutory damages.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Recent Content

By Certum Team March 5, 2026
Above the Law, a leading blog focused on the legal industry, recently highlighted Certum Group’s litigation finance fellowship, noting the opportunity for law students and business students to gain “a four-week, hands-on immersion in what it actually looks like when capital meets complex litigation.” “To succeed, lawyers need to understand not only doctrine but also finance. Law schools are beginning to reflect that shift, and students want to understand it,” Certum’s William Marra told Above the Law. “Our Summer Fellowship is about opening that door for both law and business students, and giving them meaningful exposure to the capital side of litigation.”  Applications for the fellowship are due on March 31, 2026, and should include a resume, law school transcript, and a brief 250-word statement of interest. Applications should be sent to SummerFellowship@CertumGroup.com . Above the Law’s coverage is available here , and Certum’s application page for the fellowship is available here .
By Certum Group March 2, 2026
For the third consecutive year, Certum Group will host one or more summer fellows, introducing accomplished law students and business students to the growing field of litigation finance. The Certum Group Litigation Finance Fellowship provides top law students with an opportunity to gain hands-on experience in the rapidly growing fields of litigation finance and litigation insurance. Fellows will evaluate litigation funding submissions, draft memoranda analyzing legal and damages issues, help structure and negotiate funding agreements, and contribute to marketing and business development initiatives. They will work closely with Certum’s experienced team of litigation finance, litigation insurance, and investment professionals. Throughout the program, Fellows will develop a practical understanding of how claimholders, law firms, insurers, and capital providers assess litigation risk — and how capital can be deployed as a strategic tool in complex disputes. Further information about the fellowship and instructions about how to apply are available here.
By Certum Group February 24, 2026
Columbia Law School’s blog on corporations and the public markets, The CLS Blue Sky Blog, recently featured the scholarly work on litigation finance written by Indiana University Business School Professor Suneal Bedi and Certum’s William C. Marra. In their blog post, Bedi and Marra discuss their article Litigation Finance in the Market Square , which was recently published in the Southern California Law Review. Their work reframes litigation finance as a capital markets innovation rather than solely a civil justice mechanism. While much of the public debate has centered on questions of disclosure, control, and settlement incentives, Bedi and Marra emphasize that legal claims often represent significant but illiquid contingent assets on a firm’s balance sheet. When policymakers regulate litigation finance, they are regulating not just the legal business but the capital markets. And they are regulating capital markets in a way that is more likely to harm small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) while protecting large companies from competition.  The full blog post is available here.