March 8, 2021

Will Your Settlement go Viral and Create a Run on the Bank?

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter


Kevin Skrzysowski

|

March 8, 2021

When assessing financial risk arising out of a class action settlement, companies need to consider whether a proposed settlement is likely to go viral. The four factors below should help guide the analysis: 

  1. Brand Awareness : Well-known, well-recognized consumer brands tend to have statistically higher take rates. Starkist , Redbull and Naked Juice class actions are all examples of leading brands that had settlements go viral. And that’s not a surprise considering these three companies spend millions building brand awareness.  Indeed, digital ads about settlements involving well-known companies garner more attention. This trend plays out repeatedly in class action settlements.

  1. Free Media : When news media reports on a settlement it can amplify the settlement’s chances of going viral. For example, in the Naked Juice settlement, ABC NEWS reported that “Naked Juice fans who bought bottles of the beverage in the last six years could get up to $75 in payments from a $9 million class action settlement fund after plaintiffs questioned the company’s claims of ‘100 percent juice,’ ‘all natural’ and other labeling.” After ABC NEWS ran its story, Huffington Post and others ran similar articles informing members of the public that they were eligible for up to $75. As a result, 1.4 million people visited the settlement website and 634,278 people filed claims, seeking $31,713,900 in payments. The media also spent time reporting on the Starkist and Red Bull settlements and each received more than 2.5 million claims. 

The question is why will the media pay attention to one settlement and not to others? Some factors include: 1) press releases from the parties attracting attention; 2) news stories from promotion sites like Top Class Actions; 3) notoriety of the settlement e.g., Facebook BIPA Settlement was the largest of its kind); 4) notable parties (e.g., Equifax, which suffered the largest data breach in history); 5) large benefit (e.g. the $75 benefit for a $4 product in Naked Juice ); and 6) participation by governmental entities (e.g., DOJ, FCC, FTC).

  1.   Promoter Sites: Many websites and social media groups exist for two key purposes: (1) notifying the public of available class action settlement payouts; and (2) providing a quick and easy portal for filing claims. The impact of these sites is undeniable. The claims promoters ran stories and provided direct links on the Naked Juice, Starkist and Red Bull settlements. In some settlements, the promotion sites account for more than 90% of all submitted claims. When free media, a well-known brand, and active engagement from the promotion sites are combined, the results can be catastrophic.

  1.   Closed Ecosystem: Some class actions involve a closed ecosystem where class members communicate through social media and encourage each other to participate. This occurred in Electricity Maine , a case pertaining to variable rate electricity costs.  A local Maine news station ran the story about the pending settlement, which led to a spattering of Facebook groups in which filing claims was encouraged. Accordingly, the participation rate in Electricity Maine was multiples higher than substantially similar settlements.

Know What You Are Getting

As part of the settlement analysis, companies should:

  •  assess the likelihood that the case will go viral;
  • perform a quantitative analysis on brand awareness; 
  • consider what factors will garner free media attention; 
  • evaluate the likelihood that the promotion sites will be active on the settlement; 
  • determine if there is likely to be a closed ecosystem that will affect the outcome. 

The answers to these questions will help guide the assessment of whether the proposed settlement might go viral. 

Are you looking to resolve a class action on a claims-made basis? If so, contact us to learn how we can help you to mitigate, cap, and transfer the financial risk of settlements in existing class action litigation.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Recent Content

By Certum Team March 5, 2026
Above the Law, a leading blog focused on the legal industry, recently highlighted Certum Group’s litigation finance fellowship, noting the opportunity for law students and business students to gain “a four-week, hands-on immersion in what it actually looks like when capital meets complex litigation.” “To succeed, lawyers need to understand not only doctrine but also finance. Law schools are beginning to reflect that shift, and students want to understand it,” Certum’s William Marra told Above the Law. “Our Summer Fellowship is about opening that door for both law and business students, and giving them meaningful exposure to the capital side of litigation.”  Applications for the fellowship are due on March 31, 2026, and should include a resume, law school transcript, and a brief 250-word statement of interest. Applications should be sent to SummerFellowship@CertumGroup.com . Above the Law’s coverage is available here , and Certum’s application page for the fellowship is available here .
By Certum Group March 2, 2026
For the third consecutive year, Certum Group will host one or more summer fellows, introducing accomplished law students and business students to the growing field of litigation finance. The Certum Group Litigation Finance Fellowship provides top law students with an opportunity to gain hands-on experience in the rapidly growing fields of litigation finance and litigation insurance. Fellows will evaluate litigation funding submissions, draft memoranda analyzing legal and damages issues, help structure and negotiate funding agreements, and contribute to marketing and business development initiatives. They will work closely with Certum’s experienced team of litigation finance, litigation insurance, and investment professionals. Throughout the program, Fellows will develop a practical understanding of how claimholders, law firms, insurers, and capital providers assess litigation risk — and how capital can be deployed as a strategic tool in complex disputes. Further information about the fellowship and instructions about how to apply are available here.
By Certum Group February 24, 2026
Columbia Law School’s blog on corporations and the public markets, The CLS Blue Sky Blog, recently featured the scholarly work on litigation finance written by Indiana University Business School Professor Suneal Bedi and Certum’s William C. Marra. In their blog post, Bedi and Marra discuss their article Litigation Finance in the Market Square , which was recently published in the Southern California Law Review. Their work reframes litigation finance as a capital markets innovation rather than solely a civil justice mechanism. While much of the public debate has centered on questions of disclosure, control, and settlement incentives, Bedi and Marra emphasize that legal claims often represent significant but illiquid contingent assets on a firm’s balance sheet. When policymakers regulate litigation finance, they are regulating not just the legal business but the capital markets. And they are regulating capital markets in a way that is more likely to harm small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) while protecting large companies from competition.  The full blog post is available here.