April 7, 2021

The Pitfalls of a Common Fund Settlement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter


Ross Weiner

|

April 7, 2021

When resolving class actions, plaintiffs and defendants often weigh the pros and cons of a common fund vs. a claims-made structure.  (See our previous article describing how claims made settlements are more common than you think).  One of the biggest risks of a common fund, however, is that a low claims rate will result in a windfall to participating class members.  That is exactly what happened in Bonoan v. Adobe, Inc. , 3:19-cv-01068-RS (N.D. Cal.).

Bonoan was a TCPA class action in which an individual sued Adobe, Inc., alleging that Adobe violated the TCPA by using an auto dialer to make thousands of unsolicited cell phone calls.  In late 2020, the parties agreed on a $1 million common fund settlement, with claimants entitled to a pro rata share of the settlement once attorneys’ fees, litigation costs and expenses, and incentive awards were deducted.  In the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, class counsel estimated that this would result in claimants receiving between $400 and $800, an admittedly hefty sum.  

Yet, when all the claims were tallied, the class’s lackadaisical response to the settlement resulted in something remarkable.  Rather than $400 or $800 payments, each class member would actually receive $2,800 for the trouble of having allegedly received one unwanted telephone call.  Given this, the parties decided to waive any objection to all late received claims (approximately 70), leaving each class member with $2,000 apiece, even though the maximum statutory recovery for a willful TCPA violation is $1,500.  

As plaintiff’s counsel astutely put it in the motion for final approval, the “per-claimant recovery [of $2,000] remains near the very top of [TCPA] class action settlements.”  Indeed.

***

Are you are looking to resolve a class action on a claims-made basis? If so, contact us to learn how we can help you to mitigate, cap, and transfer the financial risk of settlements in existing class action litigation.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Recent Content

By Certum Team March 5, 2026
Above the Law, a leading blog focused on the legal industry, recently highlighted Certum Group’s litigation finance fellowship, noting the opportunity for law students and business students to gain “a four-week, hands-on immersion in what it actually looks like when capital meets complex litigation.” “To succeed, lawyers need to understand not only doctrine but also finance. Law schools are beginning to reflect that shift, and students want to understand it,” Certum’s William Marra told Above the Law. “Our Summer Fellowship is about opening that door for both law and business students, and giving them meaningful exposure to the capital side of litigation.”  Applications for the fellowship are due on March 31, 2026, and should include a resume, law school transcript, and a brief 250-word statement of interest. Applications should be sent to SummerFellowship@CertumGroup.com . Above the Law’s coverage is available here , and Certum’s application page for the fellowship is available here .
By Certum Group March 2, 2026
For the third consecutive year, Certum Group will host one or more summer fellows, introducing accomplished law students and business students to the growing field of litigation finance. The Certum Group Litigation Finance Fellowship provides top law students with an opportunity to gain hands-on experience in the rapidly growing fields of litigation finance and litigation insurance. Fellows will evaluate litigation funding submissions, draft memoranda analyzing legal and damages issues, help structure and negotiate funding agreements, and contribute to marketing and business development initiatives. They will work closely with Certum’s experienced team of litigation finance, litigation insurance, and investment professionals. Throughout the program, Fellows will develop a practical understanding of how claimholders, law firms, insurers, and capital providers assess litigation risk — and how capital can be deployed as a strategic tool in complex disputes. Further information about the fellowship and instructions about how to apply are available here.
By Certum Group February 24, 2026
Columbia Law School’s blog on corporations and the public markets, The CLS Blue Sky Blog, recently featured the scholarly work on litigation finance written by Indiana University Business School Professor Suneal Bedi and Certum’s William C. Marra. In their blog post, Bedi and Marra discuss their article Litigation Finance in the Market Square , which was recently published in the Southern California Law Review. Their work reframes litigation finance as a capital markets innovation rather than solely a civil justice mechanism. While much of the public debate has centered on questions of disclosure, control, and settlement incentives, Bedi and Marra emphasize that legal claims often represent significant but illiquid contingent assets on a firm’s balance sheet. When policymakers regulate litigation finance, they are regulating not just the legal business but the capital markets. And they are regulating capital markets in a way that is more likely to harm small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) while protecting large companies from competition.  The full blog post is available here.