March 29, 2021

The Impact of COVID-19 on Class Action Settlement Take Rates

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter


Dean Gresham

|

March 29, 2021

By now, we have become accustomed to the significant changes that the Covid-19 pandemic has brought. Online shopping, Zoom conferences, facemasks and vaccination appointment competition are all part of “The New Normal.”  And apparently, so is increased participation in consumer class action settlements.

The plaintiffs’ bar is incredibly creative, and the pandemic and its effects have given it more reasons to file class action lawsuits. As the first novel coronavirus wave broke last year, millions of people cancelled travel plans, and airlines, hotels, and tour agencies suddenly were on the hook for billions worth of refunds. Many companies were caught cash-poor and were slow to issue refunds, and plaintiffs across the globe sued.  

Online behavior suggests that more people are receptive to making claims in class action settlements as they find out about them. Employees working at home are keeping social network browser tabs open at least part of the day. And, while the unemployment situation has improved since last year, when 15 million people were out of work, a still sizable group of 10.1 million were unemployed as of January, and could read increased notices of class action settlements as they were posted on social networks like Twitter, Telegram, and Facebook.

Whie consumers drive business, they also drive take-rates in class action settlements, particularly during times of financial hardship. A comparison of class action settlement take-rates from 2019 and those since the initial Covid shut-down last spring illustrates this nicely. In 2019, only 28% of class action settlements had high take-rates. However, of the class action settlements that have occurred since early March of 2020, nearly half have experienced exceptional claim take-rates.

Since the initial shutdown, consumers are spending more time online and engaging with media to a greater degree. Grocery digital coupon programs are up 57% over 2019 and enrollment in digital coupon programs across the top 30 grocery chains is up 93%. More than six in ten adults use digital coupons. Fifty-one percent of adults are using social media more, Facebook messaging has increased by 50%, and online media use has increased by over 45%.  The same factors — driving people to use coupons —  are the impetus to self identify in class action settlements and obtain free cash.  Due to Covid 19, record unemployment and low job prospects, people are looking for all sources of stretching their budgets including couponing and filing claims seeking a cash benefit.   

The following examples demonstrate the striking effect COVID-19 has had on class action settlement take-rates:

  • Two nationwide consumer products cases: both had the same notice campaigns with similar benefit amounts and settlement funds. The settlement approved in October 2020 had a 97.72% take-rate while the settlement finalized less than a year earlier, in November 2019, had a drastically lower take-rate.

  • Two state FLSA cases: the pre-Covid, 2019 case had a stronger notice campaign with a benefit of upwards of $4,500 per settlement class member; however, the post-Covid case that offered a benefit of only $250 saw three times the number of claims submitted.

  • Two nationwide FCRA cases, approved eight months apart: both had the same notice campaigns with similar common settlement funds. The settlement with the $33 benefit had a take-rate of six times higher than the settlement with the $129 benefit. The only real difference between the two was that the former reached final approval post-Covid.

As outlined in the comparisons above, regardless of the amount of the benefit available, consumers are making claims under settlements at significantly higher rates since Covid hit the U.S.   

As outlined in the comparisons above, regardless of the amount of the benefit available, consumers are making claims under settlements at significantly higher rates since Covid hit the U.S.   

Our Loss is Your Gain

If your company is defending a class action during these unsettling times, all is not lost.  Do not let the unpredictability of claim take-rates prevent you from considering a class settlement.  Risk Settlements offers the only post-litigation insurance product on the market that allows companies to mitigate, cap, and transfer the financial risk of settlement to the insurer.  Class Action Settlement Insurance (“CASI”) removes the concerns regarding the unpredictability of take-rates from the equation and provides the company with a mechanism to resolve expensive litigation efficiently for a known, fixed cost.

In a recent case, a utility provider found itself as a defendant in a class action lawsuit in which the plaintiff claimed the defendant engaged in deceptive marketing practices that caused its customers to purchase and then pay more for electricity through their fixed term supply contracts than they otherwise would have via the local delivery utility. 

After more than a year’s worth of extensive discovery, including nearly twenty depositions and review of tens of thousands of pages of documents, and with class certification pending along with multiple expert challenges, the company contacted Risk Settlements. 

With the assistance of Risk Settlements, the company was able to negotiate a claims-made settlement, whereby class members could obtain a cash benefit based upon a per-kilowatt-hour  payment structure.  Further, the settlement resulted in a certified class that consisted of hundreds of thousands of members and a significant release for the defendant.  While the claims take-rate was ultimately more than three times what it was estimated, the company was able to resolve the expensive litigation, cap its settlement exposure, obtain a class-wide release, and get back to business.  In this case, our loss was the company’s gain.

Uncertainty in the economy is just one of the many factors that can affect take-rates.  The ripple effects of high take-rates in class action settlements detract from business goals and can even derail M&A transactions and impact efforts to raise capital. CASI clients shed that uncertainty. With CASI, companies are empowered to mitigate, control, and shift the financial risk of settlement in class action litigation. 

If your company is facing uncertainty because of litigation and you would like to explore strategies to minimize that uncertainty, please contact us to discuss how we may be able to help.

Certum Group Can Help

Get in touch to start discussing options.

Recent Content

Blurred view through glass of a meeting in a sunlit office.
By Certum Team January 12, 2026
Litigation finance has become an essential tool for modern litigation strategy — but with its growth has come a wave of discovery requests seeking information about funding arrangements. These requests are improper, burdensome, and legally unsupported. To help lawyers and litigants push back with confidence, Certum has released a new Model Brief Opposing Discovery of Litigation Funding—a comprehensive, practitioner-oriented document designed to equip litigators with the strongest arguments, cases, and frameworks available. This publication is now available for free download . The Model Brief is part of Certum’s growing library of thought leadership and practical guidance on litigation finance and insurance. That library includes Certum’s Guide to Litigation Funding and its annual survey of in-house counsel . Across federal and state courts, parties continue to seek discovery into litigation funding sources and materials, often as a tactic rather than a legitimate inquiry into claims or defenses. These efforts raise serious issues: Privilege and work-product concerns Chilling effects on access to justice Attempts to shift focus away from the merits Increased litigation costs and delays Yet for many lawyers, responding to these requests requires reinventing the wheel. Certum’s model brief solves that problem. It provides a structured, persuasive, and research-backed response that can be adapted swiftly to any case. Click here to download the brief.
By Certum Team January 6, 2026
Bloomberg recently interviewed Certum Group’s William Marra as part of its coverage of efforts by commercial liability insurers to require the disclosure of third-party litigation funding agreements. Marra explained to Bloomberg that “[t]he disclosure of litigation funding risks putting impecunious litigants at a systematic disadvantage in our legal system,” adding mandatory disclosure “can disclose to defendants very valuable information, including who has funding, and critically, who does not have funding.” Marra further responded to the argument that litigation funders might fuel frivolous litigation. “To the contrary, the evidence shows that funders serve as a very effective screen, only backing the most meritorious cases, and if anything, likely resulting in fewer weak cases getting filed,” Marra said. This statements builds on arguments Marra previously advantaged in a Vanderbilt Law Review article about litigation funding.  The Bloomberg article is available here .
Blurred view of a business meeting in progress through a glass door. People are seated around a table.
By Certum Team December 17, 2025
Certum’s William Marra has been elected to the Board of Directors of the International Legal Finance Association, the litigation finance industry’s leading advocacy group. Will joins five other new members of ILFA’s Board, including: Marcel Wegmüller, the co-founder and CEO of Nivalion; David Perla, the Vice Chair of Burford Capital; Erik Bomans, the CEO of Deminor Recovery Services; Kacey Wolmer, the CEO of Contingency Capital; Rob Rothkopf, the founder and Managing Partner of Balance Legal Capital. “We are honored to welcome Marcel, David, Erik, Kacey, Rob, and William to ILFA’s Board of Directors,” said Paul Kong, the Executive Director of ILFA. “Each brings exceptional expertise, deep industry insight, and a demonstrated commitment to the responsible growth of legal finance. Their leadership will strengthen ILFA’s work to promote transparency, expand access to justice, and support the continued global development of our industry.” “I am delighted to join ILFA’s Board and assist with its important public policy work,” Will Marra said. “Litigation finance helps level the playing field and ensures cases are resolved based on their merits, not the size of a party’s checkbook. LFA’s advocacy for claimholders who need litigation finance is more important now than ever before.” The International Legal Finance Association (ILFA) represents the global commercial legal finance community, and its mission is to engage, educate and influence legislative, regulatory and judicial landscapes as the voice of the commercial legal finance industry. It is the only global association of commercial legal finance companies and is an independent, non-profit trade association promoting the highest standards of operation and service for the commercial legal finance sector. ILFA has local chapter representation around the world.